Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 23:58
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 209
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 400
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 850A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 30.7
25% 30.5 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 19.8
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 532 289 491 320 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,293
Write 1,149
Mixed 629
SusWrite 399
193% 868 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 33
198% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 691
DQ Write 659
DQ Mixed 388
370% 579 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 164%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFD824A.C16FDD2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 422 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback