Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 10:58
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 174
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 306
46% 337 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$141
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.7% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 51.3
42% 52.8 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 48.5
Splatting 45.2
42% 52 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX480GSSDSATA3 480GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 18 233 312 211 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 353
Write 290
Mixed 279
SusWrite 132
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 8.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.9% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 12,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback