Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 09:58
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 225
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 462
62% 462 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C51) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 22.5
13% 18.2 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 14.2
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX480GSSDSATA3 480GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1120A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 415 412 430 405 433 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 439
Write 424
Mixed 378
SusWrite 416
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 27
122% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 42.5
87% 169 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2666 C15 2x4GB-$47
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 31.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26.5
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback