Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '17 at 05:51
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350 Eight-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
60% Good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 137
56% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 353
38% 305 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 43.8
Parallax 69.8
28% 49.4 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 32.9
30% 37 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 137GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: UDMA 44 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 504
Write 461
Mixed 487
108% 484 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 15.3
62% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 90.1
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 10.2
31% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 621 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback