MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 14:05
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 103
50% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 160
8-Core 288
27% 224 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 37.5
30% 37.9 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 37.9
Splatting 23.1
26% 32.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 50 75 57 57 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 62%
ST500LM0 00-1EJ162 500GB
189GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 29.8
Write 30
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 29.4
39% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.3
238% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8C-PB HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 24GB
800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 16
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 12.1
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback