Monster ABRA A5 V5.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 61% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V5.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V5.3
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 61%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 72
1-Core 51
2-Core 101
47% 74.6 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 281
30% 241 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 0152) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 1.5
1% 6.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04TH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 184 195 199 202 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 337
Write 219
Mixed 231
SusWrite 194
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 10.2
44% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 24.3
41% 79.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 69%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
487GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 120 123 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 119
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 122
71% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1314 992038 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 15
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V5.3 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V5.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback