Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire 5336

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire 5336  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE51_MV
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100817
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 23:33
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 900
uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 28
33% 42.3 Pts
4-Core 31.3
8-Core 29.2
4% 30.2 Pts
64-Core 29.1
2% 29.1 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 048A)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.4 fps
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB2OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 15 22 11 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 40.5
Write 33.7
Mixed 19
SusWrite 16.2
20% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
9.81% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 1.2
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.81%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5336 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5336

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback