Packard EasyNote MH36

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote MH36  (all builds)
MotherboardPACKARD PE2L
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '21 at 20:43
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 900
U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Memory 28.5
1-Core 21.3
2-Core 16.5
16% 22.1 Pts
4-Core 20.9
8-Core 19.1
3% 20 Pts
64-Core 18.2
1% 18.2 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Device(1631 018B)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.37 fps
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.4 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS723216L9A360 160GB-$69
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FC2OC35F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 63 25 52 37 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 33.5
Write 31.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 42.4
24% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.81% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.47 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 1.5
7% 2.33 GB/s
Latency 264
15% 264 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote MH36 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote MH36

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback