Apple iMac13,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac13,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-00BE6ED71E35EB86
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 21:08
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 175
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 310
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Apple(106B 010A) 512MB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 9
6% 8.97 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 9.3
8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD HTS541010A9E662 1TB
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0AB560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 23 23 28 32 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 17
Write 18.9
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 29.4
14% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
924GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 37.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 38.2
50% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
53.9% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac13,1 Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac13,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback