PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Supermicro X10DAi (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X10DAI |
Memory | 25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150625 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | May 22 '17 at 16:15 |
Run Duration | 337 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
48.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 361.91
|
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
91.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
87%
Excellent
|
||||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
14GB free, PID 5567
|
9.34%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown(date:15/48) 9965589-013.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 13x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 10x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v41stBench 64%, 1,389 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 10x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,350Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $202 |