Today's hottest deals

Supermicro X10DAi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSupermicro X10DAi  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAI
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150625
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 22 '17 at 16:15
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 85.1
38% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 369
35% 292 Pts
64-Core 1,073
66% 1,073 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 361.91
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 40.6
Parallax 37.1
34% 39.8 fps
MRender 51
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 40
35% 42.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 410
Mixed 267
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 34.3
130% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 75.7
76% 123 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
2TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 157
Write 146
Mixed 80.2
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.24
94% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.89
10% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.96
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 1.27
106% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown(date:15/48) 9965589-013.A00G 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.9% Above average
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.4
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 11.8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X10DAi Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X10DAi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $202
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback