Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 13:59
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 78.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 303
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,182
106% 892 Pts
64-Core 2,159
134% 2,159 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
Gigabyte(1458 4040) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 460.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (100 fps cap detected)
81.2% Excellent
Lighting 99.5
Reflection 99.5
Parallax 99.4
81% 99.5 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 99.5
82% 99.5 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s34 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1141 1186 1199 1143 229 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,900
Write 1,138
Mixed 967
SusWrite 850
270% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 55
212% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 441
DQ Write 794
DQ Mixed 627
473% 621 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 220%
Great: 278%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
177GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 417 423 423 423 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 450
Mixed 452
SusWrite 402
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 56
186% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 112%
Great: 129%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
2TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 153 152 151 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 151
Write 148
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 151
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
305% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 104%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
3TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 60.9
132% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 58%
WDC WD20 EZRX-22D8PB0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 61 62 62 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.4% Below average
Read 121
Write 115
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 60.9
118% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 40
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 36.7
83% 29 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback