Medion H81H3-EM2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion H81H3-EM2  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H81H3-EM2
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140127
Uptime14.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 22:24
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 81.3
1-Core 78
2-Core 127
59% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 135
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1341 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 44.2
27% 36.8 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 44.3
Splatting 35.3
33% 40.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
648GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 115 61 84 116 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 66.7
Write 141
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 94.1
60% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 107%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
539GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 111 115 122 120 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 164
Write 117
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 118
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 107%
Intenso Micro Line 8GB
7GB free, PID 8003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.3 3.7 5.2 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 6.7
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 3.7
10% 8.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 2
87% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI 1315 BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 11.7
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-EM2 Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Medion H81H3-EM2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback