Asus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 16:14
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 99%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 60.2
1-Core 110
2-Core 195
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 646
70% 553 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 75
57% 73 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 65.4
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
266GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 979 802 801 809 815 806 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,148
Write 1180
Mixed 1,106
SusWrite 835
240% 1,067 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 66.2
223% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1338
DQ Write 919
DQ Mixed 1064
812% 1107 MB/s
Poor: 184%
This bench: 216%
Great: 288%
Sandisk SD7SB6S1 128GB
95GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 180 179 165 136 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 347
Mixed 230
SusWrite 173
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 44.2
164% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 217
176% 252 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$50
544GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 117 119 121 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 70.6
Write 71.8
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 118
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
32GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 30 30 30 25 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
39% Below average
Read 145
Write 50.6
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 37.3
88% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.9
214% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ Kingston 9905625-074.A00G 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B365-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback