Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	118.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200409
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '21 at 18:02
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	CYP-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 75.5 1-Core 63.2 2-Core 152 57% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 610 56% 469 Pts	64-Core 1,604 99% 1,604 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3554) 2GB CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Lighting 17.7 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 23.9 14% 19.9 fps	MRender 21.9 Gravity 24.1 Splatting 17.7 17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 793GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1464 1451 1425 1420 1424 1427 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 1332 Write 1,318 Mixed 1,258 SusWrite 1,435 302% 1,336 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 37.6 126% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 436 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 381 278% 367 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 347%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 960GB-$300 2,857 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 235GB free Firmware: X212T0RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 367 364 363 366 368 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 462 Write 439 Mixed 267 SusWrite 366 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 22.3 75% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 159 170% 283 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 114%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 170 170 172 170 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 153 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 170 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 164 166 165 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 151 Mixed 81.6 SusWrite 164 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 631GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 92 90 91 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 90.8 Write 83.6 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 89.7 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 676GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 110 110 109 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 91.8 Write 87 Mixed 58 SusWrite 108 63% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 100%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 457GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 79 78 77 77 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 81.8 Write 43.7 Mixed 46 SusWrite 76.6 46% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 58%
Samsung D3 Station 6TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 3.5TB free, PID 6127 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 29.4 Write 24 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 25 35% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.1 110% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-477.A 4x16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	98.4% Outstanding	MC Read 47.6 MC Write 39.4 MC Mixed 34.6 116% 40.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.5 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 89.3 45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Jingsha To be filled by O.E.M.

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	13x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	13x
Xeon E5-2697 v2IntelBench 69%, 1,265 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	8x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	8x
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 199%, 3,035 samples	6x
MP400 1TBCorsairBench 178%, 8,627 samples	5x

RAM
36JSF2G72PZ-1 4x16GBMicronBench 88%, 100 samples	6x
M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 218 samples	5x
Vengeance DDR3 2x8GBCorsairBench 43%, 57 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $429

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16