Alzenit X79M-CE3 PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Alzenit X79M-CE3 PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200529
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 12 '21 at 09:54
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 87.9 2-Core 174 67% 115 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 587 57% 469 Pts	64-Core 869 54% 869 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600 8,087 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Nvidia(10DE 094B) 1GB CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.38% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 4.5 3% 4.6 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.38% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X1120G 120GB 1,708 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 70 69 73 73 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 285 Write 20.2 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 70.3 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 13.6 59% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 48.2 DQ Mixed 76.5 67% 104 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 88%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE614 6TB 343 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 1.5TB free Firmware: APGNW517 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 130 129 134 131 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 147 Write 150 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 132 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-017.A 2x4GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.8% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.5 23% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 8 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79M-CE3 PLUS Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Alzenit X79M-CE3 PLUS

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	5x
Xeon E5-2667 v2IntelBench 75%, 1,324 samples	4x
Xeon E5-2680 0IntelBench 69%, 2,104 samples	1x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x

SSD
256GB 256GBNvmeBench 153%, 2,446 samples	3x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	3x
SSD256G 256GBBench 62%, 7 samples	1x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0- Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1 16GBSamsungBench 51%, 14 samples	3x
36JSF1G72PZ-1 2x8GBMicronBench 54%, 190 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16