Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion P6000 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion P6000 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 20:02
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 81.3
42% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 167
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 2AB1) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.862.3.0
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
510GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 134 133 145 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 144
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 137
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 22 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 22.8
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 24.4
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 76%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 5597
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 8.2 10 8.8 9.2 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 17.3
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 8.1
22% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.2
141% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBXL0 F3-10666CL9-4GBXL0 F3-10666CL9-4GBXL0 F3-10666CL9-4GBXL0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.3
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion P6000 Series Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion P6000 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback