Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3470 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Memory 87 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 167 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 404 38% 314 Pts	64-Core 407 25% 407 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 0620) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.91% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.9 Parallax 0.5 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.91% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 96 104 103 105 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 138 Write 127 Mixed 127 SusWrite 102 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 17.5 72% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 138 108% 149 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 61%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 906GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 75 74 75 75 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 75.7 Write 75.1 Mixed 44.4 SusWrite 73.5 49% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905471-009.A00LF 0198 9905471-009.A00LF 0707 HU564403EP0200 12GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 9.3 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 10.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
FirePro V5800 (FireGL V)ATIBench 9%, 444 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
64GB SSD 64GBForeseeBench 51%, 434 samples	2x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x
Solid State Disk 240GBSpccBench 71%, 15,968 samples	1x

RAM
9905471-009.A00LF 0198 9905471-009.A00LF 0707 HU564403EP0200 12GBUnknownBench 38%, 5 samples	3x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBUnknownBench 40%, 108 samples	2x
M391B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBUnknownBench 38%, 22 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16