MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 13 '21 at 06:02
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 46.9
32% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 29.9
8-Core 59.3
5% 44.6 Pts
64-Core 49.8
3% 49.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
MSI(1462 7641) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.947.0.0
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.1
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 0.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.8
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 16 47 60 54 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 73.9
Write 82.8
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 38.3
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKH200UD12808-1333 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 4.1
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P23(FX) (MS-7641)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback