QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Haswell, no TSX, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 229
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 611
65% 521 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 419GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 71 72 72 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.9% Very poor
Read 191
Write 163
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 70.1
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
3% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 72%
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 159 152 165 151 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 93%
Red Hat VirtIO 581GB
346GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 72 72 72 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.5% Good
Read 172
Write 140
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 70.2
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 103%
Red Hat VirtIO 537GB
334GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 33 38 31 32 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 111
Write 95.6
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 34.4
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 103%
Red Hat VirtIO 463GB
305GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 36 40 37 37 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
Read 102
Write 76.4
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 38.2
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 21
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback