HP 500-169

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 500-169  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 20:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 208
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 391
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 393
24% 393 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Device(1B0A 90C4) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 11
Parallax 13.7
8% 11.6 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 10.4
Splatting 8.1
7% 9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 438 442 403 211 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 423
Mixed 424
SusWrite 351
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 53.8
182% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 276
231% 334 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD38G16002 Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-169 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback