Intel X99

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory123.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 171
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 682
60% 511 Pts
64-Core 2,551
158% 2,551 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2761 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 109% Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 566 565 570 568 568 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,247
Write 1,010
Mixed 1,030
SusWrite 570
216% 964 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 71.5
227% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 773
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 709
525% 695 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 186%
Great: 346%
NT-512 512GB
392GB free
Firmware: H190115
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 364 361 348 346 346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 442
Mixed 375
SusWrite 355
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 37.2
141% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 173
141% 195 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
617GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 120 120 122 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63% Good
Read 101
Write 77.2
Mixed 66
SusWrite 118
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$80
676GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 88 93 98 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 71.8
Write 124
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 95.1
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.5
191% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
253GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 91 91 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 72
Write 21.8
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 88.8
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown atermiter atermiter atermiter atermiter atermiter atermiter 127GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 32767, 16384, 16384, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
116% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 45.8
135% 47.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 16.2
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback