Today's hottest deals

Oegstone DQ67SW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOegstone DQ67SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170601
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 10:39
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 80%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 52
2-Core 88.6
49% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 208
22% 179 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.9% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 85.3
50% 68.8 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 69.1
Splatting 46.3
48% 59.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$30
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PBBOCA0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 33 23 27 32 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 46
Write 40.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 29
26% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 34%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
843GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 178 126 157 186 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 168
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
74% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ67SW Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Oegstone DQ67SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback