| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B450M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180626 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 21 '21 at 01:20 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 34% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.7%
Good
|
69% 134 Pts
|
72% 597 Pts
|
75% 1,213 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.6%
Poor
|
27% 34.4 fps
|
26% 32.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 362 365 374 375 373 MB/s
|
99%
Outstanding
|
84% 374 MB/s
|
135% 49.2 MB/s
|
226% 328 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 181 183 182 181 182 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
112% 154 MB/s
|
150% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
9?02 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
31.5%
Below average
|
32% 11 GB/s
|
30% 10.6 GB/s
|
21% 189 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 8,979 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,928x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 1,686x |
| Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 608x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 721x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 500x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 474x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $432 |