Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory41.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 18:53
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 79.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 292
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 790
82% 658 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.7% Above average
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 76.3
Parallax 73
63% 75.7 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 58.9
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 358 366 364 368 364 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 486
Mixed 451
SusWrite 364
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 61.8
206% 72.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 281
237% 344 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
901GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 478 488 490 490 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 404
Mixed 435
SusWrite 486
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 63.4
209% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 370
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1052 1050 1083 1089 1088 1079 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,238
Write 548
Mixed 831
SusWrite 1,074
206% 923 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 81.4
276% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 346
357% 584 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 232%
Great: 277%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$62
477GB free
Firmware: 32A0T2IA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1896 1918 1922 1622 652 523 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
303% Outstanding
Read 2,279
Write 1,678
Mixed 1,382
SusWrite 1,422
378% 1,690 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 81
274% 98.6 MB/s
DQ Read 753
DQ Write 1,028
DQ Mixed 489
482% 756 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 303%
Great: 311%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
55GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 22 14 18 24 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 87.3
Write 42.7
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 19.2
39% 37.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2D3200C16 Adata DDR4 3200 CMK32GX4M2D3200C16 Adata DDR4 3200 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 23.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $338
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback