ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20M9CTO1WW

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 20M9CTO1WW (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20M9CTO1WW
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201113
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 03:51
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	SGP-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2176M 4,000 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 119 2-Core 260 85% 155 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 684 74% 589 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 4,738 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Legend(17AA 225F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 38 Parallax 36 32% 37.9 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 31.9 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics P630 2,578 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 225F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.86% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 7.9 5% 17.2 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 11.3 8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.86% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-256G-1001 256GB 914 User benchmarks, average bench 158% 160GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10190101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 500 433 437 435 436 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,327 Write 1,211 Mixed 914 SusWrite 454 218% 977 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 61.7 214% 78.8 MB/s	DQ Read 857 DQ Write 649 DQ Mixed 787 579% 765 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 218%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 931GB free Firmware: LXM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 174 174 174 170 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 170 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 173 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 8502 PSD48G21332S 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.7% Very good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 27.3 MC Mixed 22 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 23.4 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 72.8 55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 20M9CTO1WW Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 26%

Raft

System: Lenovo 20M9CTO1WW

CPU
Xeon E-2176MIntelBench 77%, 4,000 samples	73x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	63x
Core i7-8850HIntelBench 71%, 20,669 samples	60x

GPU
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	64x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	56x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	37x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	27x
WDBNCE0010PNC 1TBWDCBench 97%, 21,221 samples	23x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 239%, 34,988 samples	13x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD Micron 18ASF2G72HZ-2G6E1 24GBSamsungBench 73%, 36 samples	23x
M474A2K43BB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 443 samples	15x
M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 79%, 5,545 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback