Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory110.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190214
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 16:20
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820X-$195
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 218
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 774
71% 596 Pts
64-Core 1,305
81% 1,305 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Gigabyte(1458 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 223
Parallax 139
110% 166 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 151
Splatting 127
110% 136 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,884
Write 1,229
Mixed 600
272% 1,238 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 62
242% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 961
DQ Mixed 846
696% 998 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
10GB free
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,783
Write 1,227
Mixed 553
261% 1,187 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 54.6
201% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1,052
782% 1,039 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Hitachi HDN726040ALE614 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 183 181 186 183 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 179
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 183
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 113%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
313GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 139 140 138 142 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72% Very good
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 139
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72%
Great: 104%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
557GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 100 102 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 138
Write 116
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 101
141% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.3
175% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 50.1
MC Mixed 30.1
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 9.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback