ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 30A8S0D000

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 30A8S0D000 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	119 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150212
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '17 at 17:50
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 414 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	71.4% Very good	Memory 74 1-Core 101 2-Core 197 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 748 66% 559 Pts	64-Core 2,223 138% 2,223 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 1.5TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 167% 418GB free Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	94.5% Outstanding	Read 1,074 Write 426 Mixed 503 146% 668 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 9.23 4K Mixed 11.9 55% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 72.9 DQ Mixed 61 83% 159 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 230%
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 18993 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 109 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 17 (A8) Unknown 100 100 362 (A9) Unknown 100 100 191 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 225 (AE) Unknown 100 100 13 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 67 41 176095166497 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1842 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 29428 (F1) Unknown 253 253 8426 (F2) Unknown 253 253 8174 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	65.9% Good	Read 393 Write 147 Mixed 159 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 20.8 105% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 41.3 80% 166 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GB 591 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 8 of 12 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	MC Read 60.3 MC Write 41.5 MC Mixed 45.1 140% 49 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 92.5 43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback