Intel DB75EN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemINTEL_ DB75EN__
MotherboardIntel DB75EN  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '21 at 20:55
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 187
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 344
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
EVGA(3842 6151) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
29% Poor
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 39.4
31% 38.9 fps
MRender 28.7
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 26.9
26% 32.1 fps
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29%
Great: 30%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 295 288 286 266 257 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 440
Mixed 436
SusWrite 283
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 42
133% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 313
236% 314 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 128%
Apacer AS340 240GB
27GB free
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 228 223 206 123 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 257
Write 231
Mixed 207
SusWrite 199
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 22.7
78% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 133
106% 147 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 859B CT102464BD160B.C16 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DB75EN Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DB75EN - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback