Today's hottest deals

HP p6-2120

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p6-2120  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory1.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120419
Uptime14 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '21 at 01:01
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3620 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 35.5
2-Core 70.3
34% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 116
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 99.3
6% 99.3 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D
HP(103C 2ACF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
2.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 2.9
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.69%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 155 145 79 153 145 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 314
Write 135
Mixed 261
SusWrite 138
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 8.6
31% 8.93 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
173GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 163 195 205 156 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 328
Write 287
Mixed 284
SusWrite 171
60% 267 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 14.1
45% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 114
86% 115 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
111GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 85 85 86 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 84.2
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 68%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB
225GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 5.9 9 9 9 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Read 45.8
Write 13.1
Mixed 32.4
SusWrite 8.2
29% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 30%
Patriot Memory 16GB
11GB free, PID 3100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.5 7.4 7.6 7.2 7.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Read 27.4
Write 16.2
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 6.7
20% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 Kingston HP655409-150-HYCG 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.5% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2120 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $22
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback