Asus Z97-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics37.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-P  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140627
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 21:23
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 142
55% 94 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 422
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.8% Below average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 50.6
Parallax 37.9
36% 44.1 fps
MRender 52.2
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 49.4
42% 51.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 50 50 51 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 398
Write 381
Mixed 314
SusWrite 69
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 31.2
112% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 220
198% 300 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
368GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 353 397 394 401 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 386
Mixed 355
SusWrite 378
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 42.2
134% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 338
258% 349 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
323GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 105
SusWrite 66.5
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-P Builds (Compare 2,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-P - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback