Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory11.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200922
Uptime7 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '21 at 14:29
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 177
62% 111 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 399
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.02
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 37
Parallax 17.1
9% 21.8 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 12.1
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 632
Write 548
Mixed 503
125% 561 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 43.8
142% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 407
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 573
410% 517 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 187%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
433GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 106 105 107 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 106
Write 97.8
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 104
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.3% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 17.1
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback