Today's hottest deals

Positivo H14CU01

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemPositivo H14CU01  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo H14CU01
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140220
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '21 at 16:53
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 84.5
1-Core 49.9
2-Core 82.4
49% 72.3 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 125
17% 125 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Device(1297 2033) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3282
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4
Parallax 2.6
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
553GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 88 79 87 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 88.7
Mixed 51
SusWrite 86.4
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33.3% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H14CU01 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo H14CU01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback