bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
CPU #000, 1 CPU, 5 cores, 5 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 148
58% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 362
40% 316 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID K260Q
Nvidia(10DE 101B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 370.41
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 32.4
20% 27.8 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 24.9
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,194
Write 2,298
Mixed 2,292
506% 2,261 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 56.8
190% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 376
263% 325 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 128 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 43.1
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 101%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback