Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T3600
MotherboardDell Precision T3600  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130503
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '21 at 21:40
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 195
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 492
51% 410 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 37.1
32% 39.3 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 39.1
34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC210 2.5 7MM 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20001L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 230 293 297 295 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 428
Write 304
Mixed 280
SusWrite 268
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 20.7
70% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 220
192% 287 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 84%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 32GB
8GB free, PID dd1a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 0 2.3 3.7 7.1 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 5.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 4
10% 9.18 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1.3
59% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-YK0 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 28.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,892 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback