Philco 14M-W549

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPhilco 14M-W549  (all builds)
Motherboard 14M-W549
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '21 at 15:29
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Memory 44.4
1-Core 12.3
2-Core 9.2
19% 22 Pts
4-Core 17
8-Core 23.3
2% 20.1 Pts
64-Core 24.1
2% 24.1 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 80 71 81 81 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46% Average
Read 83.1
Write 84.8
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 77.1
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron S3A2G83-13G9PE1B00 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.23 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14M-W549 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Philco 14M-W549

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback