Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardIntel CRESCENTBAY  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150922
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 14 '17 at 11:22
Run Duration90 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5550U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 86
2-Core 163
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 250
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Intel(8086 1626) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
7.38% Terrible
Lighting 8.77
Reflection 9.42
Parallax 12.7
7% 10.3 fps
MRender 7.76
Gravity 6.53
Splatting 13
8% 9.08 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.N0G.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 107
Write 91.4
Mixed 89.8
72% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.19
80% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 19.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback