Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 419 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 91 1-Core 113 2-Core 234 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 420 8-Core 612 64% 516 Pts	64-Core 619 38% 619 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 84%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-512V2S-11 2.5 7mm 512GB 356 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 442GB free (System drive) Firmware: FC9110C SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 332 331 331 330 330 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 384 Write 347 Mixed 292 SusWrite 330 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 13.1 89% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 144 150% 245 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 3x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3 of 4 slots used 24GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 42.3 MC Write 52.3 MC Mixed 24 113% 39.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 36 SC Mixed 20.1 67% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1,316x
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples	504x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	291x

SSD
THNSN5512GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 122%, 19,561 samples	82x
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 140%, 7,011 samples	55x
PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 120%, 13,766 samples	45x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	344x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 5,035 samples	262x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 69%, 5,073 samples	155x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16