Today's hottest deals

Notebook W230SS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook W230SS  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W230SS
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 02:12
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 206
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 522
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Clevo(1558 2300) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 19.4
17% 19.1 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 15.3
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF192HCGS-000L1 192GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT03L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 150 155 153 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 393
Write 169
Mixed 188
SusWrite 147
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 23.7
70% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 43.6
DQ Mixed 57.6
55% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H641GU67F7066G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W230SS Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W230SS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $127
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback