Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44 15,557 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Memory 39.6 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 38.1 22% 32.6 Pts	4-Core 64.3 8-Core 97.1 10% 80.7 Pts	64-Core 105 6% 105 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M 18,736 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Dell(1028 05AA) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6871 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Lighting 12.1 Reflection 19.4 Parallax 18.7 10% 16.7 fps	MRender 15.8 Gravity 16.3 Splatting 20 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 17%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit DMT-80M6M-11 mS 11GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 7GB free Firmware: DMH1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 334 Write 190 Mixed 185 52% 237 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 19.4 4K Mixed 11.3 45% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 67.8 DQ Write 74.1 DQ Mixed 50.6 44% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 68%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 836GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 71 62 44 63 83 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GB 13,765 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 14.8 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 6.6 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 204 20% 204 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	631x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	122x
GTX 880MNvidiaBench 28%, 2,147 samples	99x

SSD
DMT-80M6M-11 mSATA 80GBLiteonitBench 67%, 888 samples	68x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	36x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	36x

RAM
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,671 samples	116x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 53%, 1,119 samples	80x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	64x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $209