Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Motherboard	Parallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3712 x 2302 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210127
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '21 at 11:40
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2191B 29 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Memory 59.9 1-Core 127 2-Core 251 77% 146 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 250 34% 251 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM) 2,233 User benchmarks, average bench 26% ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 16.1.3.49160 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Lighting 62.9 Reflection 68.7 Parallax 89.1 51% 73.6 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 31.4 Splatting 68.5 46% 54.1 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 47%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 107GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 39GB free (System drive) Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 3,808 Write 2,024 Mixed 2,258 594% 2,696 MB/s	4K Read 53.2 4K Write 51.4 4K Mixed 42.8 163% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 293 216% 285 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 115%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 21 65% 22.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.8 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	830x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	433x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325