Asus X550ZE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550ZE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550ZE
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151015
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJun 15 '17 at 20:01
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-7500 APU (2014 M.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 45.7
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 66.9
31% 50 Pts
4-Core 115
8-Core 116
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 118
7% 118 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 222D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.9.2
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 6.19
4% 5.19 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 4.39
3% 3.89 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 73.2
Write 80.4
Mixed 83.5
60% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.31
74% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 59%
Generic SU02G SD Card 2GB
1GB free
Firmware: 8.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.13% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 7.01
Mixed 10.2
9% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.93
4K Write 1.02
4K Mixed 1.32
370% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550ZE Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550ZE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback