PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Bh |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100609 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 17 '21 at 22:54 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 46% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X3470
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
63.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2763) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 32 42 67 76 MB/s
|
45.1%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$71
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 28 29 29 29 MB/s
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
844GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 125 126 126 126 MB/s
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 198x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 159x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 82x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 53x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 41x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 33x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 18x |
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $98 |