HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory4.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '21 at 22:54
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3470
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 133
59% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 260
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2763) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.1% Poor
Lighting 28.5
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 39.3
23% 32.9 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 36.9
Splatting 30.3
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 32 42 67 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 104
Write 83.5
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 53.2
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$71
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 29.2
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 29
22% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
844GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 125 125 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 109
Write 138
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 125
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback