Panasonic CF-H1CSMAZZZ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive7.87% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic CF-H1CSMAZZZ  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFH1S-2
Memory1 GB free of 2.00195 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 09:10
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z540
IC1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Memory 36.1
1-Core 7.7
2-Core 12.5
15% 18.8 Pts
4-Core 11.5
8-Core 13
2% 12.2 Pts
64-Core 13.1
1% 13.1 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GSSD18S-M 64GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 100707A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 27 21 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.87% Terrible
Read 54.8
Write 32
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 30.8
9% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 3.8
12% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.87%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
2048, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
6.86% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.1
MC Mixed 1.7
6% 2.13 GB/s
SC Read 0.9
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 1.2
4% 1.47 GB/s
Latency 221
18% 221 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.86%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback