ADD TO PC
BUILD

Panasonic CF-H1CSMBZ1M

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 19% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	10.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Panasonic CF-H1CSMBZ1M (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CFH1S-2
Memory	1.1 GB free of 2.00195 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100201
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '17 at 23:19
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z540 23 User benchmarks, average bench 15% IC1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	20% Poor	Memory 38.5 1-Core 7.8 2-Core 8.8 16% 18.4 Pts	4-Core 11.3 8-Core 12.9 2% 12.1 Pts	64-Core 11 1% 11 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 20%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 500 229 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Device(10F7 8338) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.14.10.2011 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.07% Terrible	Lighting 0.13 Reflection 0.08 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.07% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS64GSSD18S-M 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 100707A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 16777215 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4410 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 744 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 40 100 257700003880 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 11141149 (AD) Unknown 100 100 9767108414728	10.4% Very poor	Read 76.8 Write 44.1 Mixed 52.3 13% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.96 4K Write 6.45 4K Mixed 3.43 15% 4.95 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 15%
SMI USB DISK 8GB 3,022 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	6.92% Terrible	Read 22.3 Write 6.2 Mixed 13.3 15% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.15 4K Write 0.52 4K Mixed 0.46 45% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.92% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 36GB 1,968 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 34816 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.08% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.17 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 1.7 5% 1.6 GB/s	Latency 209 19% 209 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.08% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback