Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E6500-$83 5,942 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 55.1 1-Core 41.3 2-Core 79.3 37% 58.6 Pts	4-Core 76.6 8-Core 68.4 10% 72.5 Pts	64-Core 73.4 4% 73.4 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 02AC) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	4.69% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 8.2 Parallax 5.7 5% 6.53 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 7.5 5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.69% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA500CM10002 500GB 7,894 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: STAS1024 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 148 148 156 214 119 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.9% Average	Read 156 Write 218 Mixed 180 SusWrite 158 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 24.6 74% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 81.4 DQ Mixed 39.8 35% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 113%
Fujitsu MHV2120AT PL 120GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 87GB free Firmware: 008300A1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 30 29 31 28 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 31.9 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 29.2 21% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium D 2.80GHzIntelBench 29%, 3,782 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $100Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x
GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples	1x

SSD
SHFR200240G 240GBKingstonBench 83%, 2,078 samples	1x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x