Asus M2A-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2A-VM  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '17 at 01:32
Run Duration386 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5600+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 35.2
2-Core 84
35% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 79.5
8-Core 85.1
11% 82.3 Pts
64-Core 85.5
5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Asus(1043 82AC) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 1.78
4% 4.95 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 5.13
4% 5.21 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2120AT PL 120GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 008300A1 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Read 14.5
Write 14.6
Mixed 9.58
10% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.19
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.05
19% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 17%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 8GB
7GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
10% Very poor
Read 19.6
Write 3.82
Mixed 5.11
9% 9.52 MB/s
4K Read 4.69
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.52
93% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 4.6
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2A-VM Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2A-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback