Today's hottest deals

HC HCAR357-MI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHC HCAR357-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR357-MI
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 12:02
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 67
1-Core 113
2-Core 214
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 551
55% 446 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 14.4
Parallax 22.8
12% 17.2 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 13.6
11% 13.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint AS806 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1106A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1330 1468 1451 1532 1525 1522 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,163
Write 1587
Mixed 1219
SusWrite 1,471
360% 1,610 MB/s
4K Read 48.3
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 29.9
189% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 922
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 581
509% 760 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 269%
Great: 269%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
8GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.9 5.7 4.9 6.7 5.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 2.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.8
9% 8.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ASint ASBD408GB-WIN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.1
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 32.7
SC Mixed 22.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HCAR357-MI Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HC HCAR357-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback