HC HCAR357-MI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHC HCAR357-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR357-MI
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 21:37
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 180
63% 114 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 446
42% 345 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 6.6
Parallax 15.5
8% 10.5 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint AS806 512GB
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1106A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 754 720 700 751 764 788 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 909
Write 791
Mixed 829
SusWrite 746
184% 819 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 19.6
113% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 365
262% 319 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 128%
Great: 270%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MG8A3200C12WP-SA 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HCAR357-MI Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HC HCAR357-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback