HC HCAR357-MI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHC HCAR357-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR357-MI
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '21 at 21:58
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 110
2-Core 228
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 563
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 9 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 12
Parallax 18.5
10% 14.4 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint AS806 512GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1106A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1475 1509 1506 1603 1589 1468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,054
Write 1,580
Mixed 1,230
SusWrite 1,525
358% 1,597 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 31.1
196% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 731
DQ Mixed 590
511% 760 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 270%
Great: 270%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ASint ASBD408GB-5Wb 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 27.6
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 54: 10R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
54% 17% 70 114 88 75 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
History: Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 54: 10R 1G 1B
Typical HCAR357-MI Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HC HCAR357-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback