Today's hottest deals

HC HCAR357-MI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHC HCAR357-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR357-MI
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 24 '21 at 16:41
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 212
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 468
53% 416 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Lighting 10.7
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 18.6
9% 13.7 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 10.4
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asint AS806 512GB
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1106A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1172 1204 1234 1250 1314 1316 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,152
Write 1,307
Mixed 1,112
SusWrite 1,248
324% 1,455 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 30.4
180% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 546
462% 675 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 247%
Great: 269%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ASint ASBD408GB-5Wb 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 27.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 23
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 31.5" 1280 701 MEIA296 Panasonic-TV
Typical HCAR357-MI Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HC HCAR357-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback